2010 Honda Jazz vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 179 more horse power than 2010 Honda Jazz. (77 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (245 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Jazz. 2006 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 2010 Honda Jazz has manual transmission. 2010 Honda Jazz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Honda Jazz | 2006 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Honda | Rover |
| Model | Jazz | 75 |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1245 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 77 HP | 256 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 90.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.4 seconds | 6.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 13.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 65 L |
