2010 Honda Ridgeline vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Honda Ridgeline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Honda Ridgeline would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1411 kg more than 2010 Honda Ridgeline.
Because 2010 Honda Ridgeline is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Ridgeline will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Honda Ridgeline | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Honda | Fisker |
| Model | Ridgeline | Karma |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 36 L |
