2010 Hyundai Getz vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Hyundai Getz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Hyundai Getz would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2010 Hyundai Getz. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2010 Hyundai Getz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 805 kg more than 2010 Hyundai Getz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Hyundai Getz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Hyundai Getz. (126 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Hyundai Getz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Hyundai Getz | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Hyundai | Cadillac |
| Model | Getz | CTS |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1399 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.6 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.1 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.7 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |
