2010 Hyundai Matrix vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, both 2010 Hyundai Matrix and 2010 Holden Commodore were released in the same year (2010). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 138 more horse power than 2010 Hyundai Matrix. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2010 Hyundai Matrix.
Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Hyundai Matrix. (141 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Hyundai Matrix | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Hyundai | Holden |
Model | Matrix | Commodore |
Year Released | 2010 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 141 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |