2010 Jaguar XF vs. 1984 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1984 Holden Commodore. (78 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Commodore. (140 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Jaguar XF | 1984 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Jaguar | Holden |
| Model | XF | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1892 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 78 HP |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4961 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1461 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2908 mm | 2670 mm |
