2010 Jaguar XF vs. 2007 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2007 Ford Falcon. (220 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Jaguar XF | 2007 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Jaguar | Ford |
| Model | XF | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 237 HP | 220 HP |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 357 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4961 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1461 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2908 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 59 L |
