2010 Jaguar XF vs. 2011 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XJ is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Jaguar XF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Jaguar XF would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XJ (271 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2010 Jaguar XF. (187 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XJ (600 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jaguar XF. (450 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Jaguar XF | 2011 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | XF | XJ |
Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 450 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8 seconds | 6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4961 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1461 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2908 mm | 3157 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.4 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |