2010 Jaguar XF vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Jaguar XF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Jaguar XF would be higher. Both 2010 Jaguar XF and 2012 Jaguar XF are equipped with a 2,200 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 187 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 450 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Jaguar XF | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
| Model | XF | XF |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4961 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1461 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2908 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.4 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |
