2010 Jaguar XJ vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Holden Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Holden Rodeo would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (271 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2003 Holden Rodeo. (145 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (600 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden Rodeo. (280 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Jaguar XJ | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Jaguar | Holden |
Model | XJ | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2010 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 600 Nm | 280 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5127 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1895 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1456 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3157 mm | 3060 mm |