2010 Jaguar XJ vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (271 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2011 Jaguar XF. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2011 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (600 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Jaguar XF. (450 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Jaguar XJ | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | XJ | XF |
Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 600 Nm | 450 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6 seconds | 8 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5127 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1895 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1456 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3157 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |