2010 Jaguar XJ vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Jaguar XJ would be higher. Both 2010 Jaguar XJ and 2011 Jaguar XF are equipped with a 3,000 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 271 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 600 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Jaguar XJ | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | XJ | XF |
Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 600 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6 seconds | 5.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5127 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1895 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1456 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3157 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |