2010 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (325 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Jeep Wrangler | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Wrangler | Epica |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4138 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2103 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2423 mm | 2700 mm |