2010 Kia Cadenza vs. 2002 Isuzu D-MAX
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Isuzu D-MAX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Isuzu D-MAX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 161 more horse power than 2002 Isuzu D-MAX. (129 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2002 Isuzu D-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Isuzu D-MAX weights approximately 270 kg more than 2010 Kia Cadenza.
Because 2002 Isuzu D-MAX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Kia Cadenza. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Isuzu D-MAX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 2002 Isuzu D-MAX has manual transmission. 2002 Isuzu D-MAX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Kia Cadenza | 2002 Isuzu D-MAX | |
Make | Kia | Isuzu |
Model | Cadenza | D-MAX |
Year Released | 2010 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 129 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4965 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1475 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2845 mm | 3060 mm |