2010 Kia Cadenza vs. 2012 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Kia Cadenza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Kia Cadenza would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2012 Volkswagen Eos. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2012 Volkswagen Eos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 44 kg more than 2010 Kia Cadenza.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Kia Cadenza | 2012 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | Kia | Volkswagen |
| Model | Cadenza | Eos |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1619 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4965 mm | 4423 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1791 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1475 mm | 1444 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2845 mm | 2578 mm |
