2010 Kia Sedona vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Kia Sedona is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Sedona (244 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Sedona has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Sedona will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Kia Sedona | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Kia | Ford |
Model | Sedona | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2010 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4811 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1984 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2891 mm | 2490 mm |