2010 Lada 111 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, both 2010 Lada 111 and 2010 Holden Epica were released in the same year (2010). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2010 Lada 111. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2010 Lada 111.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Lada 111. (116 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Lada 111. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2010 Lada 111 has manual transmission. 2010 Lada 111 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Lada 111 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Lada | Holden |
Model | 111 | Epica |
Year Released | 2010 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |