2010 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 1462 kg more than 2002 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Land Rover Freelander | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Freelander | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2010 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3192 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2632 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1450 mm |