2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 918 kg more than 2003 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | Range Rover Sport | Ranger |
Year Released | 2010 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 510 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2638 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4783 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1933 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1783 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2743 mm | 3010 mm |