2010 Lexus HS vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Lexus HS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Lexus HS would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC90 (240 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2010 Lexus HS. (187 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2010 Lexus HS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 485 kg more than 2010 Lexus HS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Lexus HS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Lexus HS | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Lexus | Volvo |
| Model | HS | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | CVT | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 2155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4694 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1786 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1506 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |
