2010 Lexus RX vs. 2006 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Lexus RX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus RX (295 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2006 Volvo XC90. (182 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2010 Lexus RX.
Because 2006 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Lexus RX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Lexus RX | 2006 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Lexus | Volvo |
Model | RX | XC90 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | CVT | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2050 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1885 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1684 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2741 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 70 L |