2010 Lotus Evora vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Lotus Evora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Lotus Evora would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lotus Evora (400 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lotus Evora weights approximately 795 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lotus Evora (459 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (174 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2010 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda CR-Z. 2010 Lotus Evora has automatic transmission and 2013 Honda CR-Z has manual transmission. 2013 Honda CR-Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Lotus Evora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Lotus Evora | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Lotus | Honda |
| Model | Evora | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 459 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1991 kg | 1196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5098 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1895 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1438 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3063 mm | 2435 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 21.4 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 40 L |
