2010 Maserati Quattroporte vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Maserati Quattroporte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Maserati Quattroporte would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 275 kg more than 2010 Maserati Quattroporte.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Maserati Quattroporte (211 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2010 Maserati Quattroporte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Maserati Quattroporte | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Maserati | Mini |
Model | Quattroporte | Cooper |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 218 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3785 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1118 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2299 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9 L/100km | 5.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 50 L |