2010 Mazda 2 vs. 1984 Holden Astra

To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Holden Astra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 2 (85 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1984 Holden Astra. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 2 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1984 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 2 (122 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Astra. 1984 Holden Astra has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Holden Astra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: