2010 Mazda 3 vs. 2013 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2013 Nissan Cube is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Cube (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (113 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mazda 3 | 2013 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 3 | Cube |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 5-speed manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1755 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1471 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |