2010 Mazda 5 vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mazda 5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 962 kg more than 2010 Mazda 5.
Because 2011 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mazda 5 | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Mazda | Fisker |
| Model | 5 | Karma |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1753 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1631 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2751 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 36 L |
