2010 Mazda 6 vs. 2009 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder (187 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 6. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 6.
Because 2009 Nissan Pathfinder is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mazda 6 | 2009 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 6 | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 2010 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.7 seconds | 11 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4755 mm | 4884 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1795 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2789 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 80 L |