2010 Mazda BT-50 vs. 1997 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1997 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mazda BT-50 | 1997 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | BT-50 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2010 | 1997 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2606 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 8.8 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2620 mm |