2010 Mazda BT-50 vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mazda BT-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mazda BT-50 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 181 more horse power than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda BT-50.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (380 Nm @ 180 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda BT-50. 2012 Audi RS3 has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda BT-50 has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi RS3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mazda BT-50 | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | BT-50 | RS3 |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 180 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
