2010 Mazda CX-7 vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ranger would be higher. Both 2010 Mazda CX-7 and 2004 Ford Ranger are equipped with a 2,300 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 2 kg more than 2010 Mazda CX-7.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda CX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mazda CX-7 | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | CX-7 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 244 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1718 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4681 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1872 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1646 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2751 mm | 3010 mm |
