2010 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2006 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2006 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2006 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mazda CX-9 | 2006 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Mazda | Proton |
| Model | CX-9 | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5075 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1935 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1727 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2875 mm | 2610 mm |
