2010 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, both 2010 Mazda CX-9 and 2010 Jeep Commander were released in the same year (2010). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Commander. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 77 kg more than 2010 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2010 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Commander. (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mazda CX-9 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Mazda | Jeep |
| Model | CX-9 | Commander |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 3701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1966 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5075 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1935 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1727 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2875 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 80 L |
