2010 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2011 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2010 Mazda CX-9. (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mazda CX-9 | 2011 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Mazda | Land Rover |
| Model | CX-9 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 4367 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 700 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5075 mm | 4973 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1935 mm | 2035 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1727 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2875 mm | 2891 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 104 L |
