2010 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2012 SsangYong Chairman H
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Chairman H is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Chairman H (275 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2010 Mazda CX-9. (273 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Chairman H should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda CX-9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 391 kg more than 2012 SsangYong Chairman H.
Because 2012 SsangYong Chairman H is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 SsangYong Chairman H. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mazda CX-9 | 2012 SsangYong Chairman H | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | CX-9 | Chairman H |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 3598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 275 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1966 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5075 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1935 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1727 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2875 mm | 2910 mm |