2010 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2013 Ford Flex
To start off, 2013 Ford Flex is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Flex (281 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2010 Mazda CX-9. (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda CX-9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Flex weights approximately 62 kg more than 2010 Mazda CX-9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford Flex. (346 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford Flex.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mazda CX-9 | 2013 Ford Flex | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | CX-9 | Flex |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 346 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1966 kg | 2028 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5075 mm | 5125 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1935 mm | 2256 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1727 mm | 1726 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2875 mm | 2994 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 12.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 70 L |
