2010 Mazda Tribute vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda Tribute (240 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1997 Acura CL. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 40 kg more than 2010 Mazda Tribute.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mazda Tribute | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | Tribute | CL |
Year Released | 2010 | 1997 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4442 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1806 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1783 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2619 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 65 L |