2010 Mazda Tribute vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda Tribute (171 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda Tribute. (232 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mazda Tribute | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | Tribute | Epica |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 171 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4442 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1806 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1725 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2619 mm | 2700 mm |
