2010 Mazda Tribute vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-09 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2010 Mazda Tribute. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 937 kg more than 2010 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda Tribute. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-09 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mazda Tribute | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | Tribute | CX-09 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 2062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.9 L/100km | 12.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 76 L |