2010 Mercedes-Benz GL vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz GL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz GL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz GL (210 HP) has 116 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz GL should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz GL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz GL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mercedes-Benz GL has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mercedes-Benz GL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mercedes-Benz GL | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | GL | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2010 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5095 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1941 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1839 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3076 mm | 2490 mm |