2010 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 2013 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2013 GMC Yukon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Yukon weights approximately 313 kg more than 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Both vehicles are all wheel drive (AWD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mercedes-Benz ML | 2013 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | GMC |
Model | ML | Yukon |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 397 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
Transmission Type | CVT | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2380 kg | 2693 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5649 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1816 mm | 1962 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2913 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 119 L |