2010 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL (300 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper. 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL has automatic transmission and 2013 Mini Cooper has manual transmission. 2013 Mini Cooper will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mercedes-Benz SL | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mini |
Model | SL | Cooper |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 7-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4582 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1298 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |