2010 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 2006 Holden Captiva
To start off, 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Captiva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Captiva would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis (224 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2006 Holden Captiva. (212 HP @ 1400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Captiva.
Because 2006 Holden Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Captiva (542 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis. (372 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Holden Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis | 2006 Holden Captiva | |
| Make | Mercury | Holden |
| Model | Grand Marquis | Captiva |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1899 cc |
| Horse Power | 224 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1989 mm | 1760 mm |
