2010 Mercury Mariner vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2010 Mercury Mariner is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercury Mariner (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Mariner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercury Mariner (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Mercury Mariner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mercury Mariner | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Mariner | 66 |
Year Released | 2010 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | CVT | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1806 mm | 1550 mm |