2010 Mercury Mariner vs. 1987 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2010 Mercury Mariner is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercury Mariner (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1987 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Ranger.

Because 1987 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mercury Mariner. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2010 Mercury Mariner 1987 Ford Ranger
Make Mercury Ford
Model Mariner Ranger
Year Released 2010 1987
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2500 cc 2300 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 177 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline / Electric Hybrid Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type CVT Automatic
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1806 mm 1810 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]