2010 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1989 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 8 kg more than 1989 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Jeep Wrangler has automatic transmission and 2010 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Jeep Wrangler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mitsubishi Colt | 1989 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
Model | Colt | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2010 | 1989 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1500 cc | 4228 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1542 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3640 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1695 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 57 L |