2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs. 1982 Audi 4000
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse (162 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1982 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 4000.
Because 1982 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse (219 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 1982 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
| Model | Eclipse | 4000 |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 219 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4582 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1834 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1367 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2576 mm | 2550 mm |
