2010 Nissan Navara vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Nissan Navara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Nissan Navara would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Navara (172 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Nissan Navara | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | Navara | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.3 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2360 mm |
