2010 Nissan Pixo vs. 2011 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2011 Nissan Navara is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Nissan Pixo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Nissan Pixo would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Navara (172 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Navara should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2011 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Nissan Pixo | 2011 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | Pixo | Navara |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 996 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 172 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 155 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3210 mm |
