2010 Nissan Qashqai vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Nissan Qashqai. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Nissan Qashqai would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Qashqai. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Qashqai. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 449 kg more than 2010 Nissan Qashqai. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Qashqai, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Qashqai. (161 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Qashqai. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan Qashqai has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan Qashqai will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2010 Nissan Qashqai 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Nissan Cadillac
Model Qashqai CTS
Year Released 2010 2013
Body Type Crossover Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 112 HP 266 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 161 Nm 302 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 5700 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.6 mm 80 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1372 kg 1821 kg
Vehicle Length 4320 mm 4877 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.7 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]