2010 Nissan Rogue vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Rogue (170 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Nissan Rogue | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Rogue | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2010 | 2008 |
Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | CVT | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4646 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1801 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1684 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2490 mm |