2010 Nissan Titan vs. 2002 Saturn SC
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Saturn SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Saturn SC would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 2002 Saturn SC. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2002 Saturn SC.
Because 2010 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Saturn SC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Saturn SC. (154 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Saturn SC.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Nissan Titan | 2002 Saturn SC | |
Make | Nissan | Saturn |
Model | Titan | SC |
Year Released | 2010 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5551 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5710 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 60 L |